Airworthiness Directives; Bell Helicopter Textron Canada Model 222, 222B, 222U, and 230 Helicopters
Requires removing certain serial-numbered main rotor pendulum weight supports from service and replacing with airworthy main rotor pendulum weight supports.
[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 199 (Monday, October 15, 2001)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 52313-52315]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-25692]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. 2001-SW-49-AD; Amendment 39-12470; AD 2001-19-52]
RIN 2120-AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Bell Helicopter Textron Canada Model
222, 222B, 222U, and 230 Helicopters
AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration, DOT.
ACTION: Final rule; request for comments.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This document publishes in the Federal Register an amendment
adopting Airworthiness Directive (AD) 2001-19-52 which was sent
previously to all known U.S. owners and operators of Bell Helicopter
Textron Canada (BHTC) Model 222, 222B, 222U, and 230 helicopters by
individual letters. This AD requires removing certain serial-numbered
main rotor pendulum weight supports from service and replacing with
airworthy main rotor pendulum weight supports. This AD is prompted by
the failure of a main rotor pendulum weight support (support) resulting
in shedding of the weights and an increased level of main rotor
vibration. The actions specified by this AD are intended to prevent
failure of a support, loss of a weight set resulting in main rotor
vibration, and subsequent loss of control of the helicopter.
DATES: Effective October 30, 2001, to all persons except those persons
to whom it was made immediately effective by Emergency AD 2001-19-52,
issued on September 21, 2001, which contained the requirements of this
amendment.
Comments for inclusion in the Rules Docket must be received on or
before December 14, 2001.
ADDRESSES: Submit comments in triplicate to the Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), Office of the Regional Counsel, Southwest Region,
Attention: Rules Docket No. 2001-SW-49-AD, 2601 Meacham Blvd., Room
663, Fort Worth, Texas 76137. You may also send comments electronically
to the Rules Docket at the following address: [email protected].
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jim Grigg, Aviation Safety Engineer,
FAA, Rotorcraft Directorate, Regulations Group, Fort Worth, Texas
76193-0110, telephone (817) 222-5490, fax (817) 222-5961.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On September 21, 2001, the FAA issued
Emergency AD 2001-19-52, for BHTC
[[Page 52314]]
Model 222, 222B, 222U, and 230 helicopters, which requires removing
certain serial-numbered supports from service and replacing them with
airworthy supports. That action was prompted by the failure of a
support resulting in shedding of the weights and an increased level of
main rotor vibration. Subsequent investigation revealed that the failed
support had manufacturing defects. This condition, if not corrected,
could result in failure of a support, loss of a weight set resulting in
main rotor vibration, and subsequent loss of control of the helicopter.
Transport Canada, which is the airworthiness authority for Canada,
notified the FAA that an unsafe condition may exist on BHTC Model 222,
222B, 222U, and 230 helicopters. Transport Canada advises that due to
manufacturing discrepancies, certain supports, if not replaced, could
fail in flight.
BHTC has issued Alert Service Bulletins 222-01-91, 222U-01-62, and
230-01-24, all dated May 18, 2001, which describe procedures for
replacing all supports identified with a serial number (S/N) having the
prefix ``HD.'' Transport Canada classified these service bulletins as
mandatory and issued AD CF-2001-28, dated July 24, 2001, to ensure the
continued airworthiness of these helicopters in Canada.
These helicopter models are manufactured in Canada and are type
certificated for operation in the United States under the provisions of
14 CFR 21.29 and the applicable bilateral agreement. Pursuant to the
applicable bilateral agreement, Transport Canada has kept the FAA
informed of the situation described above. The FAA has examined the
findings of Transport Canada, reviewed all available information, and
determined that AD action is necessary for products of these type
designs that are certificated for operation in the United States.
Since the unsafe condition described is likely to exist or develop
on other BHTC Model 222, 222B, 222U, and 230 helicopters of the same
type designs, the FAA issued Emergency AD 2001-19-52 to prevent failure
of a support, loss of a weight set resulting in main rotor vibration,
and subsequent loss of control of the helicopter. The AD requires,
within 25 hours time-in-service (TIS) or 3 months, whichever occurs
first, removing from service all supports, part number 222-011-114-103,
with a S/N having the prefix ``HD'' and replacing them with airworthy
supports. The short compliance time involved is required because the
previously described critical unsafe condition can adversely affect the
structural integrity of the helicopter. Therefore, the actions
described previously are required at the specified time intervals, and
this AD must be issued immediately.
Since it was found that immediate corrective action was required,
notice and opportunity for prior public comment thereon were
impracticable and contrary to the public interest, and good cause
existed to make the AD effective immediately by individual letters
issued on September 21, 2001, to all known U.S. owners and operators of
BHTC Model 222, 222B, 222U, and 230 helicopters. These conditions still
exist, and the AD is hereby published in the Federal Register as an
amendment to 14 CFR 39.13 to make it effective to all persons. However,
the Emergency AD contained an error when listing the Transport Canada
AD number. The number was incorrectly listed as AD CF-2001-2B; the
correct number is AD CF-2001-28. There was also a comma instead of a
period at the end of Note 4 of the Emergency AD. The FAA discovered
these errors and posted a corrected Emergency AD on the Internet at
http://av-info.faa.gov/ad/ad.htm. The FAA has determined that these
changes neither increase the economic burden on an operator nor
increase the scope of the AD.
The FAA estimates that 112 helicopters of U.S. registry will be
affected by this AD, that it will take approximately 6 work hours per
helicopter to accomplish the required actions, and the average labor
rate is $60 per work hour. The manufacturer states in its service
bulletins that owners/operators complying with the service bulletin on
or before December 31, 2001 will receive a special 100% warranty credit
for the necessary parts. Based on these figures, the total cost impact
of the AD on U.S. operators is estimated to be $20,160 ($360 per
helicopter, assuming half the fleet has supports replaced and assuming
the actions are accomplished by the specified date and that the
manufacturer's instructions for receiving the credit are followed).
Comments Invited
Although this action is in the form of a final rule that involves
requirements affecting flight safety and, thus, was not preceded by
notice and an opportunity for public comment, comments are invited on
this rule. Interested persons are invited to comment on this rule by
submitting such written data, views, or arguments as they may desire.
Communications should identify the Rules Docket number and be submitted
in triplicate to the address specified under the caption ADDRESSES. All
communications received on or before the closing date for comments will
be considered, and this rule may be amended in light of the comments
received. Factual information that supports the commenter's ideas and
suggestions is extremely helpful in evaluating the effectiveness of the
AD action and determining whether additional rulemaking action would be
needed.
Comments are specifically invited on the overall regulatory,
economic, environmental, and energy aspects of the rule that might
suggest a need to modify the rule. All comments submitted will be
available in the Rules Docket for examination by interested persons. A
report that summarizes each FAA-public contact concerned with the
substance of this AD will be filed in the Rules Docket.
Commenters wishing the FAA to acknowledge receipt of their mailed
comments submitted in response to this rule must submit a self-
addressed, stamped postcard on which the following statement is made:
``Comments to Docket No. 2001-SW-49-AD.'' The postcard will be date
stamped and returned to the commenter.
The regulations adopted herein will not have a substantial direct
effect on the States, on the relationship between the national
Government and the States, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various levels of government. Therefore, it
is determined that this final rule does not have federalism
implications under Executive Order 13132.
The FAA has determined that this regulation is an emergency
regulation that must be issued immediately to correct an unsafe
condition in aircraft, and that it is not a ``significant regulatory
action'' under Executive Order 12866. It has been determined further
that this action involves an emergency regulation under DOT Regulatory
Policies and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979). If it is
determined that this emergency regulation otherwise would be
significant under DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures, a final
regulatory evaluation will be prepared and placed in the Rules Docket.
A copy of it, if filed, may be obtained from the Rules Docket at the
location provided under the caption ADDRESSES.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Safety.
[[Page 52315]]
Adoption of the Amendment
Accordingly, pursuant to the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the Federal Aviation Administration amends part 39 of
the Federal Aviation Regulations (14 CFR part 39) as follows:
PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
Sec. 39.13 [Amended]
2. Section 39.13 is amended by adding a new airworthiness directive
to read as follows:
2001-19-52 Bell Helicopter Textron Canada: Amendment 39-12470.
Docket No. 2001-SW-49-AD.
Applicability: Model 222, serial number (S/N) 47006 through
47089; Model 222B, S/N 47131 through 47156; Model 222U, S/N 47501
through 47574; and Model 230, S/N 23001 through 23038 helicopters,
certificated in any category.
Note 1: This AD applies to each helicopter identified in the
preceding applicability provision, regardless of whether it has been
otherwise modified, altered, or repaired in the area subject to the
requirements of this AD. For helicopters that have been modified,
altered, or repaired so that the performance of the requirements of
this AD is affected, the owner/operator must request approval for an
alternative method of compliance in accordance with paragraph (b) of
this AD. The request should include an assessment of the effect of
the modification, alteration, or repair on the unsafe condition
addressed by this AD; and if the unsafe condition has not been
eliminated, the request should include specific proposed actions to
address it.
Compliance: Within 25 hours time-in-service or 3 months,
whichever occurs first, unless accomplished previously.
To prevent failure of a main rotor pendulum weight support
(support), loss of a weight set resulting in main rotor vibration,
and subsequent loss of control of the helicopter, accomplish the
following:
(a) Remove from service all supports, part number 222-011-114-
103, identified with a serial number having the prefix ``HD'' and
replace with airworthy supports that do not have the S/N prefix
``HD.''
Note 2: Bell Helicopter Textron Canada Alert Service Bulletins
222-01-91, 222U-01-62, and 230-01-24, all dated May 18, 2001,
pertain to the subject of this AD.
(b) An alternative method of compliance or adjustment of the
compliance time that provides an acceptable level of safety may be
used if approved by the Manager, Regulations Group, FAA. Operators
shall submit their requests through an FAA Principal Maintenance
Inspector, who may concur or comment and then send it to the
Manager, Regulations Group.
Note 3: Information concerning the existence of approved
alternative methods of compliance with this AD, if any, may be
obtained from the Regulations Group.
(c) Special flight permits may be issued in accordance with 14
CFR 21.197 and 21.199 to operate the helicopter to a location where
the requirements of this AD can be accomplished.
(d) Emergency AD 2001-19-52, issued September 21, 2001, becomes
effective upon receipt.
Note 4: The subject of this AD is addressed in Transport Canada
(Canada) AD CF-2001-28, dated July 24, 2001.
(e) This amendment becomes effective on October 30, 2001, to all
persons except those persons to whom it was made immediately
effective by Emergency AD 2001-19-52, issued September 21, 2001,
which contained the requirements of this amendment.
Issued in Fort Worth, Texas, on October 4, 2001.
Mark R. Schilling,
Acting Manager, Rotorcraft Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 01-25692 Filed 10-12-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-U
Sources. Section 1 is written by AircraftDirectives from the record below and is a reading aid only. Section 2 is the United States Government's own text, reproduced without edit.
Federal Register: https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2001/10/15/01-25692/airworthiness-directives-bell-helicopter-textron-canada-model-222-222b-222u-and-230-helicopters
Official PDF: https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/FR-2001-10-15/pdf/01-25692.pdf
Packet generated 2026-08-18 08:16 UTC.
This packet is not an airworthiness determination and not legal or maintenance advice. AircraftDirectives reproduces official records and condenses their wording for easier reading. It does not decide, certify or imply whether any aircraft, engine, appliance or part is airworthy, compliant, affected by this directive, or eligible for return to service. No inspection, approval, or determination of any kind is performed or implied by this document.
Section 1 is a reading aid, not the rule. It is our own plain-language condensation, written to help a reader find the relevant directive quickly. It is NOT a substitute for the regulation, it may omit conditions, exceptions, compliance times, alternative methods of compliance (AMOCs) and applicability limits, and it has no legal force whatsoever. Only the official text governs. Where Section 1 and Section 2 differ in any respect, Section 2 - and the official source it was retrieved from - controls absolutely.
Responsibility remains with the owner/operator. Under 14 CFR §91.403 and §91.417 the owner or operator is responsible for maintaining airworthiness and for required records; under §39.7 no person may operate a product to which an airworthiness directive applies except in accordance with that directive. Determining applicability to a specific serial number and configuration, and performing or supervising any required action, is the responsibility of the owner/operator and appropriately certificated personnel.
Accuracy and currency. Section 2 was retrieved at the time stamped above and is reproduced without edit; Federal Register material is a work of the United States Government. Directives are amended, corrected and superseded over time, and this sheet is a snapshot, not a live record - it does not update after printing. Re-check the official sources before acting on it. This packet is provided without warranty of any kind, express or implied, including fitness for a particular purpose. We do not sell parts and have no commercial interest in any action a directive may require.