Airworthiness Directives; Industrie Aeronautiche e Meccaniche Rinaldo Piaggio S.p.A. Model P-180 Airplanes
Requires inspecting for cracks around the vertical pin and the torque tube bottom flange of the rudder, and the fasteners that connect the torque tube to the bottom flange (torque tube bottom flange assembly).
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 144 (Monday, July 28, 1997)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 40264-40266]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-19439]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. 96-CE-56-AD; Amendment 39-10088; AD 97-15-14]
RIN 2120-AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Industrie Aeronautiche e Meccaniche
Rinaldo Piaggio S.p.A. Model P-180 Airplanes
AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration, DOT.
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This amendment adopts a new airworthiness directive (AD) that
applies to Industrie Aeronautiche e Meccaniche Rinaldo Piaggio S.p.A.
(Piaggio) Model P-180 airplanes. This action requires inspecting for
cracks around the vertical pin and the torque tube bottom flange of the
rudder, and the fasteners that connect the torque tube to the bottom
flange (torque tube bottom flange assembly). If cracks are not found,
repetitively inspect until cracks are visible. If cracks are evident,
this action requires modifying the rudder torque tube bottom flange
assembly by replacing the cracked part with a part of improved design,
which terminates the repetitive inspection. This AD is the result of
several reports of fatigue cracks around the pin that vertically
supports the rudder axle. The actions specified by this AD are intended
to prevent fatigue cracks in the rudder torque tube bottom flange,
which could result in loss of rudder control and possible loss of the
airplane.
DATES: Effective September 19, 1997.
The incorporation by reference of certain publications listed in
the regulations is approved by the Director of the Federal Register as
of September 19, 1997.
ADDRESSES: Service information that applies to this AD may be obtained
from I.A.M. Rinaldo Piaggio, S.p.A., Via Cibrario, 4 16154 Genoa,
Italy. This information may also be examined at the Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), Central Region, Office of the Assistant Chief
Counsel, Attention: Rules Docket 96-CE-56-AD, Room 1558, 601 E. 12th
Street, Kansas City, Missouri 64106; or at the Office of the Federal
Register, 800 North Capitol Street, NW., suite 700, Washington, DC.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. Roman T. Gabrys, Project Officer,
Small Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service, FAA, 1201
Walnut, suite 900, Kansas City, Missouri 64106; telephone (816) 426-
6934; facsimile (816) 426-2169.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Events Leading to the Issuance of This AD
A proposal to amend part 39 of the Federal Aviation Regulations (14
CFR part 39) to include an AD that would apply to Piaggio Model P-180
airplanes was published in the Federal Register on February 24, 1997
(62 FR 8196). The action proposed to require inspecting for cracks in
the torque tube bottom flange, the fasteners, and vertical support pin
of the rudder; and, if cracks are found, modifying the rudder torque
tube bottom flange assembly by replacing the cracked part with a part
of improved design. If no cracks are found, the proposed action would
require repetitively inspecting the area until cracks appear and then
modifying the rudder torque tube bottom flange assembly (part number
(P/N) 80-373108-103 or an FAA approved equivalent) by replacing the
cracked part with a part of improved design (P/N 80-373201-001 or an
FAA approved equivalent). Accomplishment of the proposed modification
would be in accordance with Piaggio Service Bulletin (SB) 80-0076,
ORIGINAL ISSUE: May 30, 1995.
Interested persons have been afforded an opportunity to participate
in the making of this amendment. No comments were received on the
proposed rule or the FAA's determination of the cost to the public.
The FAA's Determination
After careful review of all available information, including the
service information related to the subject presented above, the FAA has
determined that air safety and the
[[Page 40265]]
public interest require the adoption of the rule as proposed except for
minor editorial corrections. The FAA has determined that these minor
corrections will not change the meaning of the AD and will not add any
additional burden upon the public than was already proposed.
Differences Between the AD, Service Bulletin, and RAI AD
I.A.M. Rinaldo Piaggio SB 80-0076, Original Issue May 30, 1995, and
the RAI AD No. 95-183, dated July 3, 1995, specify repetitively
inspecting every 500 hours time-in-service (TIS) using a dye penetrant
method, and if the crack lengths are greater than 6 mm, the part must
be replaced prior to further flight. If the crack lengths are greater
than 3 mm, but less than 6 mm, the part must be replaced within the
next 50 hours TIS; and, if the cracks are less than 3 mm, then the
parts must be replaced within the next 100 hours TIS.
The FAA has established a policy to disallow airplane operation
when known cracks exist in primary structure, unless the ability to
sustain ultimate load with these cracks is proven. The torque tube
bottom flange, the fasteners, and the vertical support pin in the
rudder (torque tube bottom flange assembly) are considered primary
structure, and the FAA has not received any analysis to prove that
ultimate load can be sustained with cracks in this area. For this
reason, the FAA has determined that AD action should be taken to
require replacement of any cracked torque tube bottom flange assembly
in the rudder.
Cost Impact
The FAA estimates that 4 airplanes in the U.S. registry will be
affected by this AD, that it will take approximately 6 workhours per
airplane to accomplish the initial inspection and that the average
labor rate is approximately $60 an hour. Parts are not accounted for in
this cost analysis because, on some airplanes, cracks may never be
discovered during one of these inspections. Based on these figures, the
total cost impact of the AD on U.S. operators is estimated to be $1,440
($360 per airplane). The FAA is not taking into account the cost for
the repetitive inspections because there is no way to determine the
number of repetitive inspections that will be incurred over the life of
the airplane.
Regulatory Impact
The regulations adopted herein will not have substantial direct
effects on the States, on the relationship between the national
government and the States, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various levels of government. Therefore, in
accordance with Executive Order 12612, it is determined that this final
rule does not have sufficient federalism implications to warrant the
preparation of a Federalism Assessment.
For the reasons discussed above, I certify that this action (1) is
not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive Order 12866;
(2) is not a ``significant rule'' under DOT Regulatory Policies and
Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and (3) will not have a
significant economic impact, positive or negative, on a substantial
number of small entities under the criteria of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act. A copy of the final evaluation prepared for this
action is contained in the Rules Docket. A copy of it may be obtained
by contacting the Rules Docket at the location provided under the
caption ADDRESSES.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.
Adoption of the Amendment
Accordingly, pursuant to the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the Federal Aviation Administration amends part 39 of
the Federal Aviation Regulations (14 CFR part 39) as follows:
PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 USC 106(g), 40113, 44701.
Sec. 39.13 [Amended]
2. Section 39.13 is amended by adding a new airworthiness directive
(AD) to read as follows:
97-15-14 Industrie Aeronautiche E Meccaniche Rinaldo PIAGGIO S.P.A.
(PIAGGIO): Amendment No. 39-10088; Docket No. 96-CE-56-AD.
Applicability: Model P-180 airplanes (all serial numbers),
certificated in any category.
Note 1: This AD applies to the airplane identified in the
preceding applicability provision, regardless of whether it has been
modified, altered, or repaired in the area subject to the
requirements of this AD. For the airplane that has been modified,
altered, or repaired so that the performance of the requirements of
this AD are affected, the owner/operator must request approval for
an alternative method of compliance in accordance with paragraph (g)
of this AD. The request should include an assessment of the effect
of the modification, alteration, or repair on the unsafe condition
addressed by this AD; and, if the unsafe condition has not been
eliminated, the request should include specific proposed actions to
address it.
Compliance: Required within the next 100 hours time-in-service
(TIS) after the effective date of this AD, unless already
accomplished, and thereafter as indicated in the body of this AD.
To prevent fatigue cracks in the rudder torque tube bottom
flange assembly, which could result in loss of rudder control and
possible loss of the airplane, accomplish the following:
(a) Inspect the torque tube bottom flange assembly of the rudder
for cracks (using a dye penetrant method) and visually inspect for
cracks in the fasteners that connect the torque tube to the bottom
flange.
Note 2: The inspection in Part A of the Compliance section of
Piaggio Service Bulletin (SB) 80-0076, ORIGINAL ISSUE: May 30, 1995,
uses different criteria than the inspection required in paragraph
(a) of this AD. This AD takes precedence over Piaggio SB 80-0076.
(b) If cracks are found, prior to further flight, modify the
rudder torque tube bottom flange assembly by replacing the cracked
part with a part of improved design in accordance with Part B and
Attachment #1 of the ACCOMPLISHMENT INSTRUCTIONS of Piaggio SB 80-
0076, ORIGINAL ISSUE: May 30, 1995.
(c) If no cracks are found, continue to inspect at intervals not
to exceed 100 hours TIS thereafter, until cracks appear. If cracks
appear during any inspection required by this AD, prior to further
flight, modify the rudder torque tube bottom flange assembly by
replacing the cracked part with a part of improved design in
accordance with Part B and Attachment #1 of the ACCOMPLISHMENT
INSTRUCTIONS of Piaggio SB 80-0076, ORIGINAL ISSUE: May 30, 1995.
(d) Modifying the rudder torque tube bottom flange assembly by
replacing torque tube bottom flange assembly with an improved torque
tube bottom flange assembly as specified in paragraphs (b) and (c)
of this AD is considered a terminating action for the repetitive
inspections required in paragraph (c) of this AD.
(e) Special flight permits may be issued in accordance with
sections 21.197 and 21.199 of the Federal Aviation Regulations (14
CFR 21.197 and 21.199) to operate the airplane to a location where
the requirements of this AD can be accomplished.
(f) An alternative method of compliance or adjustment of the
initial or repetitive compliance times that provides an equivalent
level of safety may be approved by the Manager, Small Airplane
Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service, FAA, 1201 Walnut, suite
900, Kansas City, Missouri 64106. The request shall be forwarded
through an appropriate FAA Maintenance Inspector, who may add
comments and then send it to the Manager, Small Airplane
Directorate.
[[Page 40266]]
Note 3: Information concerning the existence of approved
alternative methods of compliance with this AD, if any, may be
obtained from the Small Airplane Directorate.
(g) The inspections, modification, and replacement required by
this AD shall be done in accordance with Piaggio Service Bulletin
80-0076, ORIGINAL ISSUE: May 30, 1995. This incorporation by
reference was approved by the Director of the Federal Register in
accordance with 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51. Copies of this
service bulletin may be obtained from Industrie Aeronautiche e
Meccaniche Rinaldo Piaggio S.p.A., Via Ciobrario, 4 16154 Genoa,
Italy. Copies of this document may be inspected at the FAA, Central
Region, Office of the Assistant Chief Counsel, Room 1558, 601 E.
12th Street, Kansas City, Missouri, or at the Office of the Federal
Register, 800 North Capitol Street, NW., suite 700, Washington, DC.
(h) This amendment (39-10088) becomes effective on September 19,
1997.
Issued in Kansas City, Missouri, on July 16, 1997.
Carolanne L. Cabrini,
Acting Manager, Small Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. 97-19439 Filed 7-25-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-U
Sources. Section 1 is written by AircraftDirectives from the record below and is a reading aid only. Section 2 is the United States Government's own text, reproduced without edit.
Federal Register: https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/1997/07/28/97-19439/airworthiness-directives-industrie-aeronautiche-e-meccaniche-rinaldo-piaggio-spa-model-p-180
Official PDF: https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/FR-1997-07-28/pdf/97-19439.pdf
Packet generated 2026-08-18 08:17 UTC.
This packet is not an airworthiness determination and not legal or maintenance advice. AircraftDirectives reproduces official records and condenses their wording for easier reading. It does not decide, certify or imply whether any aircraft, engine, appliance or part is airworthy, compliant, affected by this directive, or eligible for return to service. No inspection, approval, or determination of any kind is performed or implied by this document.
Section 1 is a reading aid, not the rule. It is our own plain-language condensation, written to help a reader find the relevant directive quickly. It is NOT a substitute for the regulation, it may omit conditions, exceptions, compliance times, alternative methods of compliance (AMOCs) and applicability limits, and it has no legal force whatsoever. Only the official text governs. Where Section 1 and Section 2 differ in any respect, Section 2 - and the official source it was retrieved from - controls absolutely.
Responsibility remains with the owner/operator. Under 14 CFR §91.403 and §91.417 the owner or operator is responsible for maintaining airworthiness and for required records; under §39.7 no person may operate a product to which an airworthiness directive applies except in accordance with that directive. Determining applicability to a specific serial number and configuration, and performing or supervising any required action, is the responsibility of the owner/operator and appropriately certificated personnel.
Accuracy and currency. Section 2 was retrieved at the time stamped above and is reproduced without edit; Federal Register material is a work of the United States Government. Directives are amended, corrected and superseded over time, and this sheet is a snapshot, not a live record - it does not update after printing. Re-check the official sources before acting on it. This packet is provided without warranty of any kind, express or implied, including fitness for a particular purpose. We do not sell parts and have no commercial interest in any action a directive may require.