Airworthiness Directives; LET Aeronautical Works Model L-13 “Blanik” Sailplanes
Requires you to inspect the tail-fuselage hinge for strength requirements and damage, and also requires you to replace any hinge with damage or that does not meet strength requirements.
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 199 (Friday, October 13, 2000)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 60845-60846]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-25548]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. 99-CE-91-AD; Amendment 39-11922; AD 2000-20-11]
RIN 2120-AA64
Airworthiness Directives; LET Aeronautical Works Model L-13
``Blanik'' Sailplanes
AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration, DOT.
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This amendment adopts a new airworthiness directive (AD) that
applies to all LET Aeronautical Works (LET) Model L-13 ``Blanik''
sailplanes. This AD requires you to inspect the tail-fuselage hinge for
strength requirements and damage, and also requires you to replace any
hinge with damage or that does not meet strength requirements. This AD
is the result of mandatory continuing airworthiness information (MCAI)
issued by the airworthiness authority for the Czech Republic. The
actions specified by this AD are intended to detect and correct any
tail-fuselage hinge that is damaged or has inadequate material
characteristics. Any tail-fuselage hinge with damage or inadequate
material characteristics could fail and result in loss of controlled
flight.
DATES: This AD becomes effective on November 27, 2000.
The Director of the Federal Register approved the incorporation by
reference of certain publications listed in the regulations as of
November 27, 2000.
ADDRESSES: You may get the service information referenced in this AD
from LET Aeronautical Works, Kunovice 686 04, Czech Republic;
telephone: +420 632 55 44 96; facsimile: +420 632 56 41 13. You may
examine this information at the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA),
Central Region, Office of the Regional Counsel, Attention: Rules Docket
No. 99-CE-91-AD, 901 Locust, Room 506, Kansas City, Missouri 64106; or
at the Office of the Federal Register, 800 North Capitol Street, NW,
suite 700, Washington, DC 20001.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mike Kiesov, Aerospace Engineer, FAA,
Small Airplane Directorate, 901 Locust, Room 301, Kansas City, Missouri
64106; telephone: (816) 329-4144; facsimile: (816) 329-4090.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Discussion
What events have caused this AD? The Civil Aviation Authority
(CAA), which is the airworthiness authority for the Czech Republic,
recently notified the FAA that an unsafe condition may exist on all LET
Model L-13 ``Blanik'' sailplanes. The CAA reports an incident involving
one of the affected sailplanes where the tail-fuselage attachment
fitting was damaged. Further analysis reveals that the material
characteristics of the tail-fuselage attachment fitting were
inadequate.
What are the consequences if the condition is not corrected? The
tail-fuselage attachment fitting is a primary structural element within
the empennage. Failure of this part, if not detected and corrected,
could result in loss of controlled flight.
Has FAA taken any action to this point? We issued a proposal to
amend part 39 of the Federal Aviation Regulations (14 CFR part 39) to
include an AD that would apply to all LET Model L-13 ``Blanik''
sailplanes. This proposal was published in the Federal Register as a
notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) on August 9, 2000 (65 FR 48648).
The NPRM proposed to require you to inspect the tail-fuselage hinge for
strength requirements and damage, and would require you to replace any
hinge with damage or that does not meet strength requirements.
Was the public invited to comment? Interested persons were afforded
an opportunity to participate in the making of this amendment. No
comments were received on the proposed rule or the FAA's determination
of the cost to the public.
The FAA's Determination
What is FAA's Final Determination on this Issue? After careful
review of all available information related to the subject presented
above, we have determined that air safety and the public interest
require the adoption of the rule as proposed except for minor editorial
corrections. We determined that these minor corrections:
Will not change the meaning of the AD; and
Will not add any additional burden upon the public than
was already proposed.
Cost Impact
How many sailplanes does this AD impact? We estimate that this AD
affects 140 sailplanes in the U.S. registry.
What is the cost impact of the inspection for the affected
sailplanes on the U.S. Register? We estimate that it will take
approximately 4 workhours per sailplane to accomplish the inspection,
at an average labor rate of $60 an hour. Based on the cost factors
presented above, we estimate the total cost impact of the inspection on
U.S. operators to be $33,600, or $240 per sailplane.
What is the cost impact of the replacement for the affected
sailplanes on the U.S. Register? We estimate that it will take
approximately 16 workhours per sailplane to accomplish the replacement
(as necessary), at an average labor rate of $60 an hour. The
manufacturer will provide the replacement attachment fittings at no
cost. Based on the cost factors presented above, we estimate the total
labor cost impact of the replacement on U.S. operators to be $960 per
sailplane.
Regulatory Impact
Does this AD impact various entities? The regulations adopted
herein will not
[[Page 60846]]
have a substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship
between the national government and the States, or on the distribution
of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government.
Therefore, it is determined that this final rule does not have
federalism implications under Executive Order 13132.
Does this AD involve a significant rule or regulatory action? For
the reasons discussed above, I certify that this action (1) is not a
``significant regulatory action'' under Executive Order 12866; (2) is
not a ``significant rule'' under DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures
(44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and (3) will not have a significant
economic impact, positive or negative, on a substantial number of small
entities under the criteria of the Regulatory Flexibility Act. A copy
of the final evaluation prepared for this action is contained in the
Rules Docket. A copy of it may be obtained by contacting the Rules
Docket at the location provided under the caption ADDRESSES.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
Reference, Safety.
Adoption of the Amendment
Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the Federal Aviation Administration amends part 39 of
the Federal Aviation Regulations (14 CFR part 39) as follows:
PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
Sec. 39.13 [Amended]
2. FAA amends Section 39.13 by adding a new AD to read as follows:
2000-20-11 LET Aeronautical Works: Amendment 39-11922; Docket No.
99-CE-91-AD.
(a) What sailplanes are affected by this AD? This AD applies to
Model L-13 ``Blanik'' sailplanes, all serial numbers, certificated
in any category.
(b) Who must comply with this AD? Anyone who wishes to operate
any of the above sailplanes on the U.S. Register must comply with
this AD.
(c) What problem does this AD address? The actions specified by
this AD are intended to prevent the tail-fuselage hinge failing and
consequent loss of controlled flight.
(d) What actions must I accomplish to address this problem? To
address this problem, you must accomplish the following:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Actions Compliance times Procedures
------------------------------------------------------------------------
(1) Inspect the tail- Within 60 days after Follow the
fuselage attachment November 27, 2000 procedures in
fitting, part number (P/N) (the effective date Mandatory Bulletin
A 102 021N, for damage and of this AD). No. L13/085a, dated
material hardness. November 17, 1999.
(2) If the tail-fuselage Before further You must notify LET
attachment fitting is flight after the Aeronautical Works
damaged or the material inspection. and request they
does not meet the hardness send the
requirements specified in replacement part
the service bulletin, you with installation
must replace the tail- instructions.
fuselage attachment fitting.
(3) Do not install, on any As of November 27, Inspect any
sailplane, a P/N A 102 021N 2000 (the effective attachment fitting
attachment fitting that has date of this AD). in accordance with
not passed the inspection the previously
requirements specified in referenced service
paragraph (d)(1) of this AD. bulletin.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
(e) Can I comply with this AD in any other way? You may use an
alternative method of compliance or adjust the compliance time if:
(1) Your alternative method of compliance provides an equivalent
level of safety; and
(2) The Manager, Small Airplane Directorate, approves your
alternative. Submit your request through an FAA Principal
Maintenance Inspector, who may add comments and then send it to the
Manager, Small Airplane Directorate, 901 Locust, Room 301, Kansas
City, Missouri 64106.
Note 1: This AD applies to each sailplane identified in
paragraph (a) of this AD, regardless of whether it has been
modified, altered, or repaired in the area subject to the
requirements of this AD. For sailplanes that have been modified,
altered, or repaired so that the performance of the requirements of
this AD is affected, the owner/operator must request approval for an
alternative method of compliance in accordance with paragraph (e) of
this AD. The request should include an assessment of the effect of
the modification, alteration, or repair on the unsafe condition
addressed by this AD; and, if you have not eliminated the unsafe
condition, specific actions you propose to address it.
(f) Where can I get information about any already-approved
alternative methods of compliance? Contact Mike Kiesov, Aerospace
Engineer, FAA, Small Airplane Directorate, 901 Locust, Room 301,
Kansas City, Missouri 64106; telephone: (816) 329-4144; facsimile:
(816) 329-4090.
(g) What if I need to fly the sailplane to another location to
comply with this AD? The FAA can issue a special flight permit under
sections 21.197 and 21.199 of the Federal Aviation Regulations (14
CFR 21.197 and 21.199) to operate your sailplane to a location where
you can accomplish the requirements of this AD.
(h) Are any service bulletins incorporated into this AD by
reference? Actions required by this AD must be done in accourdance
with LET Mandatory Bulletin No. L13/085a, dated November 17, 1999.
The Director of the Federal Register approved this incorporation by
reference under 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51. You can get
copies from LET Aeronautical Works, Kunovice 686 04, Czech Republic;
telephone: +420 632 55 44 96; facsimile: +420 632 611 26. You can
look at copies at the FAA, Central Region, Office of the Regional
Counsel, 901 Locust, Room 506, Kansas City, Missouri, or at the
Office of the Federal Register, 800 North Capitol Street, NW, suite
700, Washington, DC 20001.
(i) When does this amendment become effective ? This amendment
becomes effective on November 27, 2000.
Note 2: The subject of this AD is addressed in Czech Republic AD
Number CAA-AD-T-112/1999, dated November 18, 1999.
Issued in Kansas City, Missouri, on September 28, 2000.
Michael Gallagher,
Small Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 00-25548 Filed 10-12-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P
Sources. Section 1 is written by AircraftDirectives from the record below and is a reading aid only. Section 2 is the United States Government's own text, reproduced without edit.
Federal Register: https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2000/10/13/00-25548/airworthiness-directives-let-aeronautical-works-model-l-13-blanik-sailplanes
Official PDF: https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/FR-2000-10-13/pdf/00-25548.pdf
Packet generated 2026-08-18 08:13 UTC.
This packet is not an airworthiness determination and not legal or maintenance advice. AircraftDirectives reproduces official records and condenses their wording for easier reading. It does not decide, certify or imply whether any aircraft, engine, appliance or part is airworthy, compliant, affected by this directive, or eligible for return to service. No inspection, approval, or determination of any kind is performed or implied by this document.
Section 1 is a reading aid, not the rule. It is our own plain-language condensation, written to help a reader find the relevant directive quickly. It is NOT a substitute for the regulation, it may omit conditions, exceptions, compliance times, alternative methods of compliance (AMOCs) and applicability limits, and it has no legal force whatsoever. Only the official text governs. Where Section 1 and Section 2 differ in any respect, Section 2 - and the official source it was retrieved from - controls absolutely.
Responsibility remains with the owner/operator. Under 14 CFR §91.403 and §91.417 the owner or operator is responsible for maintaining airworthiness and for required records; under §39.7 no person may operate a product to which an airworthiness directive applies except in accordance with that directive. Determining applicability to a specific serial number and configuration, and performing or supervising any required action, is the responsibility of the owner/operator and appropriately certificated personnel.
Accuracy and currency. Section 2 was retrieved at the time stamped above and is reproduced without edit; Federal Register material is a work of the United States Government. Directives are amended, corrected and superseded over time, and this sheet is a snapshot, not a live record - it does not update after printing. Re-check the official sources before acting on it. This packet is provided without warranty of any kind, express or implied, including fitness for a particular purpose. We do not sell parts and have no commercial interest in any action a directive may require.