Airworthiness Directives; Bombardier Model CL-215-1A10 and CL-215-6B11 Series Airplanes
Requires repetitive inspections to detect cracking of main landing gear (MLG) axles that have been reworked by chromium plating, and replacement of cracked axles with serviceable axles.
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 28 (Wednesday, February 11, 2004)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 6538-6539]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-2577]
[[Page 6538]]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. 2003-NM-139-AD; Amendment 39-13457; AD 2004-03-13]
RIN 2120-AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Bombardier Model CL-215-1A10 and CL-
215-6B11 Series Airplanes
AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration, DOT.
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This amendment supersedes an existing airworthiness directive
(AD), applicable to certain Bombardier Model CL-215-1A10 and CL-215-
6B11 series airplanes, that currently requires repetitive inspections
to detect cracking of main landing gear (MLG) axles that have been
reworked by chromium plating, and replacement of cracked axles with
serviceable axles. This amendment requires a dimensional check and
follow-on corrective actions, mandates terminating action for certain
airplanes, and adds three airplanes to the applicability in the
existing AD. The actions specified by this AD are intended to prevent
cracking of the inner bearing surface of the MLG axles, which could
result in failure of an axle, subsequent separation of the wheel from
the airplane, and consequent reduced controllability of the airplane
during takeoff or landing. This action is intended to address the
identified unsafe condition.
DATES: Effective March 17, 2004.
The incorporation by reference of a certain publication, as listed
in the regulations, is approved by the Director of the Federal Register
as of March 17, 2004.
The incorporation by reference of a certain other publication, as
listed in the regulations, was approved previously by the Director of
the Federal Register as of November 8, 1995 (60 FR 54421, October 24,
1995).
ADDRESSES: The service information referenced in this AD may be
obtained from Bombardier, Inc., Canadair, Aerospace Group, P.O. Box
6087, Station Centre-ville, Montreal, Quebec H3C 3G9, Canada. This
information may be examined at the Federal Aviation Administration
(FAA), Transport Airplane Directorate, Rules Docket, 1601 Lind Avenue,
SW., Renton, Washington; or at the FAA, New York Aircraft Certification
Office, 1600 Stewart Avenue, Westbury, New York; or at the Office of
the Federal Register, 800 North Capitol Street, NW., suite 700,
Washington, DC.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: David Lawson, Aerospace Engineer,
Airframe and Propulsion Branch, ANE-171, FAA, New York Aircraft
Certification Office, 1600 Stewart Avenue, Westbury, New York 11581;
telephone (516) 228-7300; fax (516) 794-5531.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: A proposal to amend part 39 of the Federal
Aviation Regulations (14 CFR part 39) by superseding AD 95-22-04,
amendment 39-9411 (60 FR 54421, October 24, 1995), which is applicable
to certain Canadair Model CL-215-1A10 and CL-215-6B11 series airplanes,
was published in the Federal Register on December 5, 2003 (68 FR
67971). The action proposed to require inspections to detect cracking
of main landing gear (MLG) axles that have been reworked by chromium
plating, and replacement of cracked axles with serviceable axles. That
action also proposed to add a dimensional check and follow-on
corrective actions, mandate terminating action for certain airplanes,
and add three airplanes to the applicability in the existing AD.
Comments
Interested persons have been afforded an opportunity to participate
in the making of this amendment. No comments were submitted in response
to the proposal or the FAA's determination of the cost to the public.
Conclusion
The FAA has determined that air safety and the public interest
require the adoption of the rule as proposed.
Cost Impact
There are approximately 3 airplanes of U.S. registry that will be
affected by this AD.
The inspections that are currently required by AD 95-22-04 take
about 2 work hours per airplane to accomplish, at an average labor rate
of $65 per work hour. Based on these figures, the cost impact of the
currently required inspections on U.S. operators is estimated to be
$390, or $130 per airplane, per inspection cycle.
The dimensional check and ultrasonic inspection required by this AD
action will take about 2 work hours per airplane to accomplish, at an
average labor rate of $65 per work hour. Based on these figures, the
cost impact of these checks and inspections on U.S. operators is
estimated to be $390, or $130 per airplane, per cycle.
The replacement required by this AD action, if done, will take
about 8 work hours per airplane to accomplish, at an average labor rate
of $65 per work hour. Required parts will cost approximately $13,000
per assembly (two per airplane). Based on these figures, the cost
impact of the replacement required by this AD on U.S. operators is
estimated to be $26,520 per airplane.
The cost impact figures discussed above are based on assumptions
that no operator has yet accomplished any of the requirements of this
AD action, and that no operator would accomplish those actions in the
future if this AD were not adopted. The cost impact figures discussed
in AD rulemaking actions represent only the time necessary to perform
the specific actions actually required by the AD. These figures
typically do not include incidental costs, such as the time required to
gain access and close up, planning time, or time necessitated by other
administrative actions.
Regulatory Impact
The regulations adopted herein will not have a substantial direct
effect on the States, on the relationship between the national
Government and the States, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various levels of government. Therefore, it
is determined that this final rule does not have federalism
implications under Executive Order 13132.
For the reasons discussed above, I certify that this action (1) is
not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive Order 12866;
(2) is not a ``significant rule'' under DOT Regulatory Policies and
Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and (3) will not have a
significant economic impact, positive or negative, on a substantial
number of small entities under the criteria of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act. A final evaluation has been prepared for this action
and it is contained in the Rules Docket. A copy of it may be obtained
from the Rules Docket at the location provided under the caption
ADDRESSES.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.
Adoption of the Amendment
0
Accordingly, pursuant to the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the Federal Aviation Administration amends part 39 of
the Federal Aviation Regulations (14 CFR part 39) as follows:
[[Page 6539]]
PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
0
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
Sec. 39.13 [Amended]
0
2. Section 39.13 is amended by removing amendment 39-9411 (60 FR 54421,
October 24, 1995), and by adding a new airworthiness directive (AD),
amendment 39-13457, to read as follows:
2004-03-13 Bombardier, Inc. (Formerly Canadair): Amendment 39-13457.
Docket 2003-NM-139-AD. Supersedes AD 95-22-04, Amendment 39-9411.
Applicability: Model CL-215-1A10 (piston) and CL-215-6B11
(turboprop) series airplanes, having serial numbers 1001 through
1125 inclusive, certificated in any category.
Compliance: Required as indicated, unless accomplished
previously.
To prevent cracking in the inner bearing surface of the main
landing gear (MLG) axles, which could result in failure of an axle,
subsequent separation of the wheel from the airplane, and consequent
reduced controllability of the airplane during takeoff or landing,
accomplish the following:
Restatement of Certain Requirements of AD 95-22-04
Repetitive Inspections/Corrective Action
(a) Within 60 days after November 8, 1995 (the effective date of
AD 95-22-04, amendment 39-9411), perform either an eddy current
inspection or a chemical inspection of the inner bearing surface
area of the left and right MLG axles to determine if they have been
reworked using chromium plating, in accordance with Canadair Alert
Service Bulletin 215-A462, dated June 2, 1993; or Bombardier Alert
Service Bulletin 215-A462, Revision 3, dated January 17, 2000. If
the inner bearing surface of the MLG axle has not been reworked
using chromium plating, no further action is required by this
paragraph for that axle only.
(b) If the inner bearing surface of the MLG axle has been
reworked using chromium plating, prior to further flight, perform an
ultrasonic inspection to detect cracking in the axle, in accordance
with Canadair Alert Service Bulletin 215-A462, dated June 2, 1993;
or Bombardier Alert Service Bulletin 215-A462, Revision 3, dated
January 17, 2000.
(1) If no crack is detected during this inspection, repeat the
ultrasonic inspection at intervals not to exceed 150 landings.
(2) If any crack is detected during this inspection, prior to
further flight, remove the cracked axle and replace it with a
serviceable axle that does not have an inner bearing surface that
has been reworked using chromium plating, in accordance with the
service bulletin.
New Requirements of This AD
Dimensional Check/Follow-on Corrective Actions
(c) Within 150 landings after the effective date of this AD: Do
a dimensional check by measuring the diameter of the left and right
MLG axles to determine if they have been reworked outside the
dimensions specified in Canadair CL-215 Overhaul Manual PSP 298, or
if the axle has unknown rework dimensions or the service life of
that axle cannot be determined, in accordance with Bombardier Alert
Service Bulletin 215-A462, Revision 3, dated January 17, 2000.
(1) If any axle has been reworked outside the specified
dimensions, or has unknown rework dimensions, or if the service life
of that axle cannot be determined: Prior to further flight, do an
ultrasonic inspection to detect cracking of the axle, in accordance
with the alert service bulletin, and replace the axle with a
serviceable axle before the accumulation of 1,050 total landings, in
accordance with the alert service bulletin. Such replacement ends
the repetitive inspections for that axle only.
(i) If no cracking is detected during the inspection required by
paragraph (c)(1) of this AD, repeat the inspection at intervals not
to exceed 150 landings, and replace with a serviceable axle before
the accumulation of 1,050 total landings, in accordance with the
alert service bulletin.
(ii) If any cracking is detected during the inspection required
by paragraph (c)(1) of this AD, prior to further flight, replace the
axle with a serviceable axle in accordance with the alert service
bulletin.
(2) If the service life of the axle is known, and the axle has
not been reworked outside the specified dimensions, no further
action is required by this AD for that axle only.
Actions Done per Previous Issues of Service Bulletin
(d) Inspections and replacements done before the effective date
of this AD in accordance with Canadair Alert Service Bulletin 215-
A462, dated June 2, 1993; or Bombardier Alert Service Bulletin 215-
A462, Revision 1, dated August 26, 1996; or Revision 2, dated March
3, 1999; are considered acceptable for compliance with the
applicable actions specified in this AD.
Alternative Methods of Compliance
(e) In accordance with 14 CFR 39.19, the Manager, New York
Aircraft Certification Office, FAA, is authorized to approve
alternative methods of compliance for this AD.
Incorporation by Reference
(f) The actions shall be done in accordance with Canadair Alert
Service Bulletin 215-A462, dated June 2, 1993; and Bombardier Alert
Service Bulletin 215-A462, Revision 3, dated January 17, 2000; as
applicable.
(1) The incorporation by reference of Bombardier Alert Service
Bulletin 215-A462, Revision 3, dated January 17, 2000; is approved
by the Director of the Federal Register in accordance with 5 U.S.C.
552(a) and 1 CFR part 51.
(2) The incorporation by reference of Canadair Alert Service
Bulletin 215-A462, dated June 2, 1993; was approved previously by
the Director of the Federal Register as of November 8, 1995 (60 FR
54421, October 24, 1995).
(3) Copies may be obtained from Bombardier, Inc., Canadair,
Aerospace Group, P.O. Box 6087, Station Centre-ville, Montreal,
Quebec H3C 3G9, Canada. Copies may be inspected at the FAA,
Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton,
Washington; or at the FAA, New York Aircraft Certification Office,
1600 Stewart Avenue, Westbury, New York; or at the Office of the
Federal Register, 800 North Capitol Street, NW., suite 700,
Washington, DC.
Note 1: The subject of this AD is addressed in Canadian
airworthiness directive CF-1993-08R3, dated March 30, 2000.
Effective Date
(g) This amendment becomes effective on March 17, 2004.
Issued in Renton, Washington, on January 29, 2004.
Kalene C. Yanamura,
Acting Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. 04-2577 Filed 2-10-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P
Sources. Section 1 is written by AircraftDirectives from the record below and is a reading aid only. Section 2 is the United States Government's own text, reproduced without edit.
Federal Register: https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2004/02/11/04-2577/airworthiness-directives-bombardier-model-cl-215-1a10-and-cl-215-6b11-series-airplanes
Official PDF: https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/FR-2004-02-11/pdf/04-2577.pdf
Packet generated 2026-08-18 08:19 UTC.
This packet is not an airworthiness determination and not legal or maintenance advice. AircraftDirectives reproduces official records and condenses their wording for easier reading. It does not decide, certify or imply whether any aircraft, engine, appliance or part is airworthy, compliant, affected by this directive, or eligible for return to service. No inspection, approval, or determination of any kind is performed or implied by this document.
Section 1 is a reading aid, not the rule. It is our own plain-language condensation, written to help a reader find the relevant directive quickly. It is NOT a substitute for the regulation, it may omit conditions, exceptions, compliance times, alternative methods of compliance (AMOCs) and applicability limits, and it has no legal force whatsoever. Only the official text governs. Where Section 1 and Section 2 differ in any respect, Section 2 - and the official source it was retrieved from - controls absolutely.
Responsibility remains with the owner/operator. Under 14 CFR §91.403 and §91.417 the owner or operator is responsible for maintaining airworthiness and for required records; under §39.7 no person may operate a product to which an airworthiness directive applies except in accordance with that directive. Determining applicability to a specific serial number and configuration, and performing or supervising any required action, is the responsibility of the owner/operator and appropriately certificated personnel.
Accuracy and currency. Section 2 was retrieved at the time stamped above and is reproduced without edit; Federal Register material is a work of the United States Government. Directives are amended, corrected and superseded over time, and this sheet is a snapshot, not a live record - it does not update after printing. Re-check the official sources before acting on it. This packet is provided without warranty of any kind, express or implied, including fitness for a particular purpose. We do not sell parts and have no commercial interest in any action a directive may require.