Airworthiness Directives; Pacific Aerospace Corporation, Ltd. Models FU24-954 and FU24A-954 Airplanes
Requires you to perform repetitive detailed visual inspections of the forward vertical fin base for cracks.
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 28 (Wednesday, February 11, 2004)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 6553-6555]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-2953]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. 2003-CE-38-AD; Amendment 39-13473; AD 2004-03-29]
RIN 2120-AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Pacific Aerospace Corporation, Ltd.
Models FU24-954 and FU24A-954 Airplanes
AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The FAA adopts a new airworthiness directive (AD) for all
Pacific Aerospace Corporation, Ltd. Models FU24-954 and FU24A-954
airplanes. This AD requires you to perform repetitive detailed visual
inspections of the forward vertical fin base for cracks. If any cracks
or discrepancies are found, you must repair the structure before
further flight and notify the FAA. This AD is the result of mandatory
continuing airworthiness information (MCAI) issued by the airworthiness
authority for New Zealand. We are issuing this AD to detect and correct
cracks in the vertical fin base, which could result in loss of the fin
and loss of aircraft control.
DATES: This AD becomes effective on April 19, 2004.
ADDRESSES: You may view the AD docket at FAA, Central Region, Office of
the Regional Counsel, Attention: Rules Docket No. 2003-CE-38-AD, 901
Locust, Room 506, Kansas City, Missouri 64106. Office hours are 8 a.m.
to 4 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Karl Schletzbaum, Aerospace Engineer,
Small Airplane Directorate, 901 Locust, Room 302, Kansas City, MO
64106; telephone: 816-329-4146; facsimile: 816-329-4090.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Discussion
What events have caused this AD? The Civil Aviation Authority
(CAA), which is the airworthiness authority for New Zealand, notified
the FAA of an unsafe condition that may exist on all
[[Page 6554]]
Pacific Aerospace Corporation, Ltd. Models FU24-954 and FU24A-954
airplanes. The CAA reports a recent fatal accident where the aircraft's
fin separated in flight. Initial investigation of this accident
indicates that the forward fin structure failed from fatigue cracks
that were concealed beneath the rubber abrasion protection fitted to
the fin.
What is the potential impact if FAA took no action? Failure to
detect cracks in the vertical fin base could result in loss of the fin
and loss of aircraft control.
Has FAA taken any action to this point? We issued a proposal to
amend part 39 of the Federal Aviation Regulations (14 CFR part 39) to
include an AD that would apply to all Pacific Aerospace Corporation,
Ltd. Models FU24-954 and FU24A-954 airplanes. This proposal was
published in the Federal Register as a notice of proposed rulemaking
(NPRM) on October 30, 2003 (68 FR 61766). The NPRM proposed to require
you to perform repetitive detailed visual inspections of the forward
vertical fin base for cracks. If any cracks or discrepancies are found,
you must repair the structure before further flight and notify the FAA.
Comments
Was the public invited to comment? We provided the public the
opportunity to participate in the development of this AD. We received
no comments on the proposal or on the determination of the cost to the
public.
Conclusion
What is FAA's final determination on this issue? We have carefully
reviewed the available data and determined that air safety and the
public interest require adopting the AD as proposed except for the
changes discussed above and minor editorial corrections. We have
determined that these changes and minor corrections:
--are consistent with the intent that was proposed in the NPRM for
correcting the unsafe condition; and
--do not add any additional burden upon the public than was already
proposed in the NPRM.
Changes to 14 CFR Part 39--Effect on the AD
How does the revision to 14 CFR part 39 affect this AD? On July 10,
2002, the FAA published a new version of 14 CFR part 39 (67 FR 47997,
July 22, 2002), which governs the FAA's AD system. This regulation now
includes material that relates to altered products, special flight
permits, and alternative methods of compliance. This material
previously was included in each individual AD. Since this material is
included in 14 CFR part 39, we will not include it in future AD
actions.
Costs of Compliance
How many airplanes does this AD impact? We estimate that this AD
affects 2 airplanes in the U.S. registry.
What is the cost impact of this AD on owners/operators of the
affected airplanes? We estimate the following costs to accomplish the
inspection:
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total cost per Total cost on
Labor cost Parts cost airplane U.S. operators
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
8 workhours est. $60 per hour = $480......... No parts needed for inspection. $480 $960
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The FAA has no method of determining the number of repairs each
owner/operator will incur over the life of each of the affected
airplanes based on the results of the inspections. We have no way of
determining the number of airplanes that may need such repair. The
extent of damage may vary on each airplane.
Regulatory Findings
Will this AD impact various entities? We have determined that this
AD will not have federalism implications under Executive Order 13132.
This AD will not have a substantial direct effect on the States, on the
relationship between the national government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of
government.
Will this AD involve a significant rule or regulatory action? For
the reasons discussed above, I certify that this AD:
1. Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive Order
12866;
2. Is not a ``significant rule'' under the DOT Regulatory Policies
and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and
3. Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
We prepared a summary of the costs to comply with this AD and
placed it in the AD Docket. You may get a copy of this summary by
sending a request to us at the address listed under ADDRESSES. Include
``AD Docket No. 2003-CE-38-AD'' in your request.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Safety.
Adoption of the Amendment
0
Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the Administrator,
the Federal Aviation Administration amends part 39 of the Federal
Aviation Regulations (14 CFR part 39) as follows:
PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
0
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
Sec. 39.13 [Amended]
0
2. FAA amends Sec. 39.13 by adding a new AD to read as follows:
2004-03-29 Pacific Aerospace Corporation, Ltd.: Amendment 39-13473;
Docket No. 2003-CE-38-AD.
When Does This AD Become Effective?
(a) This AD becomes effective on April 19, 2004.
What Other ADs Are Affected by This Action?
(b) None.
What Airplanes Are Affected by This AD?
(c) This AD affects Models FU24-954 and FU24A-954 airplanes, all
serial numbers, that are certificated in any category.
What Is the Unsafe Condition Presented in This AD?
(d) This AD is the result of a recent fatal accident where the
aircraft's fin separated in flight. The actions specified in this AD
are intended to detect and correct cracks in the vertical fin base,
which could result in loss of the fin or loss of control of the
aircraft.
What Must I Do To Address This Problem?
(e) To address this problem, you must do the following:
[[Page 6555]]
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Actions Compliance Procedures
------------------------------------------------------------------------
(1) Perform visual Initially inspect Inspect from the
inspection of the forward within the next 50 bottom of the fin
area at the base of the fin hours time-in- up to the first
for cracks. service (TIS) after external strap,
April 19, 2004 (the paying particular
effective date of attention to the
this AD). skin in the area of
Repetitively the rivets that
inspect every 100 join the fin skin
hours TIS to the bulkhead,
thereafter. part number (P/N)
242305, and aft to
the first vertical
lap joint. To do
this inspection,
remove any rubber
abrasion protection
that is fitted in
this area,
including any
sealant. You must
also remove the fin
leading edge
fairing, P/N
242321.
(2) Repair any cracks that Prior to further Obtain an FAA-
are found during the flight after doing approved repair
inspection. any inspection scheme from Pacific
required in Aerospace
paragraph (e)(1) of Corporation, Ltd.,
this AD. Airport Road,
Hamilton Airport,
Hamilton, New
Zealand and notify
the FAA at the
address and phone
number in paragraph
(f) of this AD.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
May I Request an Alternative Method of Compliance?
(f) You may request a different method of compliance or a
different compliance time for this AD by following the procedures in
14 CFR 39.19. Unless FAA authorizes otherwise, send your request to
your principal inspector. The principal inspector may add comments
and will send your request to the Manager, Standards Office, FAA,
Small Airplane Directorate. For information on any already approved
alternative methods of compliance, contact Karl Schletzbaum,
Aerospace Engineer, Small Airplane Directorate, 901 Locust, Room
301, Kansas City, MO 64106; telephone: (816) 329-4146; facsimile:
(816) 329-4090.
Is There Other Information That Relates to This Subject?
(g) CAA airworthiness directive DCA/FU24/173, dated April 23,
2002, also addresses the subject of this AD.
Issued in Kansas City, Missouri, on February 4, 2004.
Dorenda D. Baker,
Manager, Small Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 04-2953 Filed 2-10-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-U
Sources. Section 1 is written by AircraftDirectives from the record below and is a reading aid only. Section 2 is the United States Government's own text, reproduced without edit.
Federal Register: https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2004/02/11/04-2953/airworthiness-directives-pacific-aerospace-corporation-ltd-models-fu24-954-and-fu24a-954-airplanes
Official PDF: https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/FR-2004-02-11/pdf/04-2953.pdf
Packet generated 2026-08-18 08:13 UTC.
This packet is not an airworthiness determination and not legal or maintenance advice. AircraftDirectives reproduces official records and condenses their wording for easier reading. It does not decide, certify or imply whether any aircraft, engine, appliance or part is airworthy, compliant, affected by this directive, or eligible for return to service. No inspection, approval, or determination of any kind is performed or implied by this document.
Section 1 is a reading aid, not the rule. It is our own plain-language condensation, written to help a reader find the relevant directive quickly. It is NOT a substitute for the regulation, it may omit conditions, exceptions, compliance times, alternative methods of compliance (AMOCs) and applicability limits, and it has no legal force whatsoever. Only the official text governs. Where Section 1 and Section 2 differ in any respect, Section 2 - and the official source it was retrieved from - controls absolutely.
Responsibility remains with the owner/operator. Under 14 CFR §91.403 and §91.417 the owner or operator is responsible for maintaining airworthiness and for required records; under §39.7 no person may operate a product to which an airworthiness directive applies except in accordance with that directive. Determining applicability to a specific serial number and configuration, and performing or supervising any required action, is the responsibility of the owner/operator and appropriately certificated personnel.
Accuracy and currency. Section 2 was retrieved at the time stamped above and is reproduced without edit; Federal Register material is a work of the United States Government. Directives are amended, corrected and superseded over time, and this sheet is a snapshot, not a live record - it does not update after printing. Re-check the official sources before acting on it. This packet is provided without warranty of any kind, express or implied, including fitness for a particular purpose. We do not sell parts and have no commercial interest in any action a directive may require.