Airworthiness Directive

AD 95-01-02 60 FR 2877 Active

Federal Aviation Administration · 14 CFR part 39

FR document
95-633
Amendment
39-9113
Published
1995-01-12
Effective
1995-01-27
Models covered
1
Last live check
2026-09-30
This page is a reference Record, not an airworthiness or compliance determination. Official FAA and manufacturer sources control over our restatement, subject to governing law. Check applicability, current requirements and incorporated documents before acting. The owner or operator remains responsible for airworthiness and required records under 14 CFR 91.403 and 91.417, as applicable. Terms of Use: /terms.
AD

95-01-02

FR doc 95-633 · 60 FR 2877

AD 95-01-02Published 1995-01-12Effective 1995-01-27

FAA rule - 14 CFR 39

FAA rule. Compliance with an applicable AD is required under 14 CFR 39.7. Check its effective date, applicability, compliance times and current status.

Requires replacement of existing LT10282(B,K)-5.

Full official abstract

This amendment supersedes three existing airworthiness directives (AD), applicable to Hartzell Model HC-B4TN-5(D,G,J)L/ LT10282(B,K)-5.3R and HC-B4TN-5(D,G,J)L/LT10282N(B,K)-5.3R propellers installed on Mitsubishi MU-2 series aircraft. These AD's currently require replacement of existing LT10282(B,K)-5.3R propeller blades with LT10282N(B,K)-5.3R improved ``N'' configuration propeller blades, and repetitive inspection and rework when required of the inner hub arm bore. This amendment requires new repair limits, shot peening procedures, and retirement at 10,000 hours time in service for the ``N'' configuration blades. Additionally, this action requires replacement of existing propeller hubs with new improved fatigue strength steel hubs and requires inspection, and specified rework as necessary, of the new steel hubs at a repetitive interval of 3,000 hours time in service. This amendment is prompted by a determination that the current hub design and blade repair limits do not adequately protect against initiation of fatigue cracks in the propeller hub arm bore and do not prevent the resonant speed of the propeller from shifting into the permitted ground idle operating range. The actions specified by this AD are intended to prevent initiation of fatigue cracks in propeller assemblies and subsequent progression to propeller failure, with departure of the blade, or hub arm and blade, that may result in loss of aircraft control.

More directives for Mitsubishi MU-2

  1. AD 2020-26-14 Airworthiness Directives; Mitsubishi Heavy Industries, Ltd. Airplanes 2020-12-29
  2. AD 2016-08-19 Airworthiness Directives; Mitsubishi Heavy Industries, Ltd. Airplanes 2016-05-02
  3. AD 2015-01-02 Airworthiness Directives; Mitsubishi Heavy Industries, Ltd. Airplanes 2015-01-22
  4. AD 2010-10-17 Airworthiness Directives; Mitsubishi Heavy Industries, Ltd. Various Mode... 2010-06-17
  5. AD 2007-17-09 Airworthiness Directives; Mitsubishi Heavy Industries MU-2B Series Airpl... 2007-08-21

All Mitsubishi MU-2 directives

Applies to 1 model in our index